WAT: opCmp and opEquals woes

[Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d]

On 25/07/14 11:37, Walter Bright wrote:

> We went through the likely code breakage from this in this thread, and
> it's hard to see any non-broken code breaking. It will also fix
> regression https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13179 and stop that
> breakage.

So opEquals will not be required to be defined if opCmp is defined if 
it's used as an AA key?

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg