WAT: opCmp and opEquals woes

[H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d]

On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 11:27:57PM -0700, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On 7/25/2014 11:05 PM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
[...]
> >In the meantime, I think much of the confusion comes from the current
> >documentation not be adequately clear about the reasoning behind
> >having opCmp and opEquals, so it's too easy to get the wrong
> >impression that defining opCmp is enough to make things work, or to
> >have a fuzzy inaccurate understanding for how opCmp interacts with
> >opEquals, and when/why to use each. I think a documentation PR is in
> >order.
> 
> I welcome a PR from you on this!

https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dlang.org/pull/620


T

-- 
Give a man a fish, and he eats once. Teach a man to fish, and he will sit forever.