[ABI] 128bit integers and other vendor types

Daniel Murphy via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Mon Jul 28 12:13:03 PDT 2014


"Andrei Alexandrescu"  wrote in message 
news:lr64ah$1akc$1 at digitalmars.com...

> Agreed. Conversely we'd be hamstringing ourselves by essentially making D 
> a poorer choice for implementing dmd than any other languages.

This doesn't make any sense.  Somehow D is a worse choice than C++ if we 
don't use phobos?

> I'm not among the compiler development regulars but it seems to me 
> converting to ddmd would be a mistake if we don't plan for using Phobos.

You are severely underestimating the benefits of D as a language. 



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list