Voting: std.logger

[Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d]

On 7/28/14, 11:46 PM, Dicebot wrote:
> On Tuesday, 29 July 2014 at 06:09:25 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> No in current form. Yes assuming the fixes below are implemented.
>
>> ...
>
>> No. I also think any new module should sit in std.experimental for one
>> release cycle.
>
> Clarification, just to be sure you got it right - right now we _only_
> vote on inclusion into std.experimental, even if majority of voters will
> consider it Phobos-quality. Staging period of one release cycle is
> mandatory.
>
> That said - can you explain a bit more why you think it can't be
> included in std.experimental? (== think that it is fundamentally broken
> to the point it can't be even suggested for experiments) Most issues
> listed seem to be more related to actual Phobos inclusion.

I explained in the non-negotiable points. The point of keeping a module 
in std.experimental is watching for only minor tweaks. I think e.g. the 
names in the API is in need of solid change, which is easy to effect but 
affects callers quite a bit. -- Andrei