Voting: std.logger

[ponce via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 29 July 2014 at 05:11:33 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> (sorry for being a bit late, was distracted)
>
> std.logger proposal by Robert Schadek enters voting period 
> which will last two weeks starting from now.
>
> Discussion thread : 
> http://forum.dlang.org/post/zhvmkbahrqtgkptdlcvh@forum.dlang.org
>
> This voting will be somewhat different from previous ones 
> because it will be done with std.experimental in mind. Because 
> of that please reply with a bit more structured votes:
>
> 1) Yes / No for inclusion into std.experimental

Yes.

>
> At this point please consider if module has functionality you 
> want to see in standard library in general and if 
> implementation is not fundamentally broken. This is a simple 
> sanity check.
>
> 2) Yes / No for inclusion into Phobos in its current state

Yes. A lot of reusable components need warnings (hence: logging).


> This is where you should summarize your concerns raised during 
> review if there are any and make decision if existing API / 
> architecture are promising enough to be set in stone via Phobos 
> inclusion.
>
> 3) If you have answered "No" for (2) :  list of mandatory 
> changes that are needed to make you vote "Yes"
>
> 4) Any additional comments for author.
>

Thanks.