Case for std.experimental

safety0ff via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Tue Jul 29 10:55:56 PDT 2014


On Tuesday, 29 July 2014 at 17:35:34 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu 
wrote:
>
> I'd just want to have a simple litmus test that prevents 
> std.experimental from becoming a dumping ground of unfinished 
> work.

I screwed up that post, but in brief I meant to agree with your 
quote for the case of std.logger.



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list