Case for std.experimental

[Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d]

On 7/29/14, 12:01 PM, Sean Kelly wrote:
> Frankly, if Dub is bundled with D, I don't see any reason for
> std.experimental to exist.  Those two ideas just seemed to
> develop in parallel.

The way I see it:

* dub: a loose federation of libraries with no implied promise.

* std.experimental: 99% sure to make it in std, use at your risk but 
there's a high likelihood you'll just remove ".experimental" next 
release, fix whatever doesn't compile, and you're good to go.


Andrei