Case for std.experimental

[uri via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 29 July 2014 at 17:22:38 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
[snip]
> I wonder what are other opinions.

Here's what I'd like to see as a D user with std.experimental...

dub:
     ==> free-for-all libraries of varying quality
     ==> Promoted on official D website.
     ==> Included in the D download

std.experimental:
     ==> Released with Phobos
     ==> Reviewed modules by core D devs, akin to BETA/RC
     ==> Guarantees on API stability but not set in stone.
     ==> [maybe?] Changes require deprecation and another round in 
std.experimental


std:
     ==> High quality with API in stone.
     ==> Modules have been through 2 rounds of review
     ==> Changes require deprecation over a longer period.





Cheers,
uri.