Case for std.experimental

Dicebot via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Wed Jul 30 08:56:56 PDT 2014


On Wednesday, 30 July 2014 at 15:24:22 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
> The decision (which I support) was to go with std.experimental, 
> as it makes it clear that there are no API stability guarantees

..and at the same time you do want to require the very same 
stability guarantees :)


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list