Case for std.experimental

[Dicebot via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 30 July 2014 at 17:44:06 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu 
wrote:
> No! The point here is we don't offer the guarantees. We just 
> don't want std.experimental to devolve into "anything goes" 
> territory. If a library has known significant work ahead of it, 
> we shouldn't put it in std.experimental. -- Andrei

Ok, I will keep those rules in mind for future reviews / voting 
even if I don't understand their merit :)