checkedint call removal

Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Thu Jul 31 15:28:23 PDT 2014


On 07/31/2014 01:32 PM, bearophile wrote:
>
> More comments:
>
> -------------------
>
> A problem with code like this is that it's drowing in noise. The
> precondition/invariant/variant code in the 't3' function is obscuring
> what the code is actually doing on the data:
> http://toccata.lri.fr/gallery/queens.en.html

It is not an inherent issue with verification. One way to avoid this is 
to allow correctness proofs to be done in a separate place.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list