std.experimental – DConf?

[Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d]

On 30/05/14 12:53, w0rp wrote:

> It's always, always easier to experiment by releasing a dub package.
> Including a module in the standard library requires the approval of a
> commity. You can always release a dub package, no one is going to stop you.
>
> std.experimental is probably best used for things that are 90% of the
> way into being included in std. We could find out how to address the
> remaining 10% then by seeing how people actually use the modules.

I agree. In my opinion std.experimental would be for modules that have 
already passed the standard review process and are put in 
std.experimental for a couple of releases to battle test the API's.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg