[OT] Apple introduces Swift as Objective-C sucessor

[Chris Cain via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 3 June 2014 at 13:18:38 UTC, Byron Heads wrote:
> "Use .. to make a range that omits its upper value, and use ... 
> to make a range that includes both values."
>
> That is going to be a source of a lot of bugs, so easy to type 
> 3 when you ment 2

Agreed. But I think if the language made it differentiate better, 
having exclusive and inclusive versions could work...

inclusive: 0...8
exclusive: 0..<9

Personally, when I'm writing out pseudocode I almost always use 
"..<" because it's obvious and no one has ever wondered "What do 
you mean by that?" I've heard a few times from people that wanted 
to clarify whether I meant inclusive or exclusive by "0..9"