[OT] Apple introduces Swift as Objective-C sucessor
ponce via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Thu Jun 5 00:13:52 PDT 2014
On Thursday, 5 June 2014 at 04:35:18 UTC, Russel Winder via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
>
> I think Pike, Cox, et al. disagree; for them exceptions are
> only a
> termination mechanism and return codes are the way of
> communicating. If
> Swift has no exceptions, then Apple must be following the Go
> model
> rather than the D, Python, (C++ ?), etc. one.
>
It seems interesting to note that for M# it's the exact reverse,
exceptions are for recoverable errors and crashing is for
unrecoverable ones (I lost the link to the reference).
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list