Need review: explicit package protection

[Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d]

On 08/06/14 23:47, Dicebot via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> Of course it is possible but I don't think it is a good project structure to
> encourage. If these modules are so closely related they should be moved to
> single math-n-stuff package.

Yea, I was concerned about the opposite, that you'd wind up with lots of 
package(std) access when in fact it's just a couple of modules that actually 
need access to the functionality in question.