What's going on with std.experimental.lexer?

[Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d]

On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 10:31:59 -0400, David Gileadi <gileadis at nspmgmail.com>  
wrote:

> On 6/10/14, 3:57 AM, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d wrote:
>> I agree all the way with std.experimental as the package name.  Though
>> I might throw in an alternative argument to stdx and instead promote
>> unsafe.* or std.unsafe.  ;-)
>
> The only issue I see with *.unsafe.* is that it sounds related to  
> @safety. So far I haven't seen a better name than std.experimental.

If it weren't a keyword, volatile would be a very good package name for  
this.

-Steve