foreach
Manu via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Thu Jun 12 08:00:11 PDT 2014
I often find myself wanting to write this:
foreach(; 0..n) {}
In the case that I just want to do something n times and I don't
actually care about the loop counter, but this doesn't compile.
You can do this:
for(;;) {}
If 'for' lets you omit any of the loop terms, surely it makes sense
that foreach would allow you to omit the first term as well?
I see no need to declare a superfluous loop counter when it is unused.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list