What's going on with std.experimental.lexer?

[dennis luehring via Digitalmars-d]

Am 13.06.2014 16:59, schrieb Dejan Lekic:
>> Please no.  See: javax
>>
>> Spelling out 'experimental' is probably the best, for all those
>> reasons
>> already stated.
>
> What's wrong with javax?
>

experimental is 100% clear and simple to understand beeing evil

javax was interpreted as eXtendet or eXtra or whatever, so people have
no problem in using experimental stuff all the while