UFCS & overloaded property getters/setters

[Kapps via Digitalmars-d]

Odd, I thought you weren't able to override only a single 
overload of a property? I might be imagining things, but I recall 
at least previously that you had to override all getters/setters 
if you wanted to override any for a property.

Personally I think D made a significant mistake in the way 
properties are handled, with treating them as multiple methods 
tenuously tied together with sticking @property on (hopefully) 
all of them. I'd much rather it were a single property with 
getters/setters inside, similar to the way C# does it. Ideally 
something like:

/// Documentation
@property int foo() @safe pure nothrow {
     get() const { return _bar.foo; }
     set(int val) { _bar.foo = val; }
}

As opposed to

/// Documentation
@property int foo() const @safe pure nothrow {
     return _bar.foo;
}

/// ditto
@property void foo(int val) @safe pure nothrow {
     _bar.foo = val;
}

Then you would actually have to override all or nothing, it would 
be treated as a single property not as multiple method overloads, 
etc.