Strange issue on OSX
Jeremy DeHaan via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Fri Jun 13 20:22:28 PDT 2014
On Saturday, 14 June 2014 at 02:30:56 UTC, Chris Cain wrote:
> On Saturday, 14 June 2014 at 02:12:45 UTC, Jeremy DeHaan wrote:
>> I agree. Also, this page (http://dlang.org/dmd-osx.html) says
>> that the base requirement is a 32 bit OSX. Why is the DMD
>> version that is released 64 bit? That seems very counter
>> intuitive.
>
> Honestly, I feel like it should be noted that you need to build
> from source to get the 32-bit version... but I don't see why it
> should be included in the actual binary release. Not even Apple
> supports the 32-bit hardware anymore. AFAIK, 64-bit Macs came
> out in late 2006, so we're talking about 8 year old hardware at
> this point.
I didn't realize that was the case. Like I said in my original
post, I haven't used a mac before this so I am pretty new to them.
It definitely would have been nice if it said something about
needing to build it for 32 bit OSX though. I think that would
have saved me a lot of time.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list