Is D production-ready?

[ponce via Digitalmars-d]

On Monday, 16 June 2014 at 11:46:57 UTC, Chris Cain wrote:
> On Monday, 16 June 2014 at 10:51:11 UTC, ponce wrote:
>> Ahem, looks like I commited something too early. This is a bug.
>> In the mean time you can use the "==1.1.1" version.
>
> Actually, sadly, you can't use gfm at all (or, at least, I 
> can't) ... It complains about not being able to satisfy 
> dependencies, even specifying 1.1.1. (That might be a dub bug, 
> though)

I'll look into it.

Depending on the parent package named "gfm" is fortunately never 
what you really want, since it depends itself on all other 
sub-packages which would make it a monolithic dependency.
Specifying sub-packages instead in dependencies is the intended 
usage.

> No real need for reports, yet. AFAIK, all SDL2 things are 
> available, but more wrappers could be available for things, I 
> think. Plus it's best to save reports for things until after I 
> get out of this stage of using your library: 
> http://mlkshk.com/r/97VP (i_have_no_idea_what_im_doing_dog.jpg)

Fine.

>
> If I start coming up with things, I'll start doing pull 
> requests :)
>
> Thanks btw for gfm. So far it's been a pleasure to work with 
> (despite not working with it as much as I'd like)

It will only become better when you start complaining :)