foreach

[H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d]

On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 01:31:21PM -0700, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 06:37:56PM +0000, Wyatt via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> > On Monday, 16 June 2014 at 17:52:29 UTC, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> [...]
> > >Or, on the flip side, functions with 10-15 parameters, each of which
> > >influences which subset of the others actually have any effect.
> > >
> > Tame.  Gaze upon true horror:
> > 
> > #2  0x0809082c in stnz_sutrs (rec=0x461d550,
> > app_context_arg=0x461dfd0, attribute_set=0x0, answer_complete=1,
> > present_type=2, cgm=0, graphics=0, highlight_option=1,
> > records_requested=1, current_field=76, num_fields=88,
> > field=0x462a160, ans=0x0, database=0x45e0628 "REGISTRY",
> > esn_list=0x461dd98, issue_break=0x461d754, callback=0x806f82d
> > <display_next_answer>, callback_arg=0x461d668,
> > field_callback=0x8087bff <field_formatter>,
> > field_callback_arg=0x462adb8, callback_scheduled=0xfef92ac0, dg=0,
> > dp=5, line_length=100) at stnz_sutrs.c:399
> 
> Whoa. I think I need therapy after reading this...
[...]

Aaarrggghh... I thought that was bad, and then I saw this:

	http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?BadCode

(Search for "SUBROUTINE FEMA" on that page. It's a function with 292
parameters(!).)


T

-- 
"Real programmers can write assembly code in any language. :-)" -- Larry Wall