Tail pad optimization, cache friendlyness and C++ interrop

[Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d]

On 6/19/2014 12:59 PM, Joakim wrote:
> Admittedly his concerns are unclear, but his problem is with the backend, not
> the frontend, which he already said he likes better now that it's
> boost-licensed.  He claims that the proprietary backend scares potential
> contributors away and that it should be "split up" from the frontend, by which
> he might mean putting it in a separate git repo?
>
> I don't know enough about these copyright tainting concerns to say if it's a
> good idea, just pointing out that he was talking about the backend, not the
> frontend.

Ok, but I'll also point out that LDC and GDC are fully free & open source.