shorter alternative of constructor with parameter

[Dicebot via Digitalmars-d]

On Saturday, 21 June 2014 at 18:57:25 UTC, Suliman wrote:
>>and save syntactic sugar for more useful features.
> How not implementing this future will help to save syntactic 
> sugar?

There is a limited amount of non-widespread syntax sugar you can 
fit into language without harming its learning curve. By spending 
it on features that don't make big difference you make language 
over-saturated by the time something really important becomes 
necessary.