DIP64: Attribute Cleanup

francesco cattoglio via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sat Jun 21 14:50:32 PDT 2014


On Saturday, 21 June 2014 at 20:48:41 UTC, Brian Schott wrote:
> I think the proposal said that the type constructors would be 
> exempt, You wouldn't have @const but you would have @final.

I think you needed to underline this part better. This is indeed 
extremely important, and that is the reason for people 
complaining about your DIP being only "just moving 
inconsistencies around"


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list