DIP64: Attribute Cleanup
Paolo Invernizzi via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sun Jun 22 00:16:22 PDT 2014
On Sunday, 22 June 2014 at 06:37:22 UTC, Jonathan M Davis via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Jun 2014 22:07:22 -0700
>
> I'd much rather just put up with having to explain to people
> that we didn't
> want to add new keywords and that that's why @safe, @trusted,
> @system,
> @property, and @nogc have @ on them and nothing else does -
> i.e. it's pretty
> much purely a question of age. Sure, the inconsitency sucks,
> but I think that
> it would suck more to have to have @ everywhere. I wouldn't
> mind having @safe
> and company changed to keywords to make the attributes
> consistent, but I very
> much doubt that that would be acceptable at this point.
>
> - Jonathan M Davis
+1
---
Paolo
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list