DIP64: Attribute Cleanup

Paolo Invernizzi via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sun Jun 22 00:16:22 PDT 2014


On Sunday, 22 June 2014 at 06:37:22 UTC, Jonathan M Davis via 
Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Jun 2014 22:07:22 -0700
>
> I'd much rather just put up with having to explain to people 
> that we didn't
> want to add new keywords and that that's why @safe, @trusted, 
> @system,
> @property, and @nogc have @ on them and nothing else does - 
> i.e. it's pretty
> much purely a question of age. Sure, the inconsitency sucks, 
> but I think that
> it would suck more to have to have @ everywhere. I wouldn't 
> mind having @safe
> and company changed to keywords to make the attributes 
> consistent, but I very
> much doubt that that would be acceptable at this point.
>
> - Jonathan M Davis

+1

---
Paolo


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list