Time to rename "D" to "@D" !?

[Grogan via Digitalmars-d]

On Monday, 23 June 2014 at 22:16:22 UTC, Grogan wrote:
> On Monday, 23 June 2014 at 22:02:26 UTC, Tobias Pankrath wrote:
>>> import std.stdio;
>>>
>>> @safe int safe()
>>> {
>>> 	auto i = 8;
>>> 	return i;
>>> }
>>>
>>> void main(string ars[])
>>> {
>>> 	writeln(safe);
>>> 	
>>> }
>>> ---------------------------
>>>
>>> What you want is just impossible...
>>
>> Would be a good use case for dfix. It really isn't hard to 
>> rename every identifier consistently.
>
> Maybe the future will tell you you're right...
> From my point of view this change is a very unprobable one but 
> who knows ?
> ^^
>
> People are skeptikal about the the air-skate too...
> I don't wanna be segregative...

I meant the 'hoverboard' of course...

BTW I think '@' makes sense. And another BTW: in your fantastic 
nazi plan which consists into eradicating the '@' prefix, how 
would look the UDA ?
I mean that '@' has a signification in the D grammar not only for 
predifined attributes, but also for user ones...