Time to rename "D" to "@D" !?

[Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d]

On 23 June 2014 23:58, Grogan via Digitalmars-d
<digitalmars-d at puremagic.com> wrote:
> On Monday, 23 June 2014 at 22:16:22 UTC, Grogan wrote:
>>
>> On Monday, 23 June 2014 at 22:02:26 UTC, Tobias Pankrath wrote:
>>>>
>>>> import std.stdio;
>>>>
>>>> @safe int safe()
>>>> {
>>>>         auto i = 8;
>>>>         return i;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> void main(string ars[])
>>>> {
>>>>         writeln(safe);
>>>>
>>>> }
>>>> ---------------------------
>>>>
>>>> What you want is just impossible...
>>>
>>>
>>> Would be a good use case for dfix. It really isn't hard to rename every
>>> identifier consistently.
>>
>>
>> Maybe the future will tell you you're right...
>> From my point of view this change is a very unprobable one but who knows ?
>> ^^
>>
>> People are skeptikal about the the air-skate too...
>> I don't wanna be segregative...
>
>
> I meant the 'hoverboard' of course...
>
> BTW I think '@' makes sense. And another BTW: in your fantastic nazi plan
> which consists into eradicating the '@' prefix, how would look the UDA ?
> I mean that '@' has a signification in the D grammar not only for predifined
> attributes, but also for user ones...
>

Godwin's Law.