Few recent dmd pull requests

[bearophile via Digitalmars-d]

Meta:

>> const* p2 = new int(3);  // const(int)*
>
> Won't some people, especially those coming from C++, mistake 
> this for being syntax to create a constant pointer to a mutable 
> int?

C/C++ const is very different from D one (transitive), so C++ 
programmers must learn the differences.

If a C++ mistakes that for a constant pointer to a mutable int, 
and tries to modify the int, she receives a compilation error. So 
this doesn't seem able to cause bugs or significant problems.

Bye,
bearophile