Bounty Increase on Issue #1325927

[safety0ff via Digitalmars-d]

On Friday, 27 June 2014 at 09:42:22 UTC, Don wrote:
>
> Yes, of course I'm not interested in bounties. But note that 
> that issue is not really a "bug", it's a project.
> I put hundreds of hours of work into this, to get to the point 
> where we are now - fixing the compiler structure to the point 
> where a JIT is possible. That work was funded by an insolvency 
> payout :). Daniel Murphy has done some work on it, as well.
>
> I doubt bounties are effective as a motivation for this kind of 
> thing.

Is there any chance you could offer a brief summary of the state 
of things w.r.t. this issue?

I.e. expanding on this comment: "Upgrading severity. I've done 
several commits to move towards a solution but I still need to do 
more restructuring to properly fix this."

Perhaps the bounty won't stimulate anybody who doesn't have other 
motivations to improve the situation, but more information about 
the scope of the issue would be helpful to both backers and 
potential claimants.