Pair literal for D language
deadalnix via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sat Jun 28 14:49:45 PDT 2014
On Saturday, 28 June 2014 at 21:22:14 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
> On 06/28/2014 09:40 PM, deadalnix wrote:
>> On Friday, 27 June 2014 at 05:45:19 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
>> Digitalmars-d
>> wrote:
>>>> We'd make a step forward when we stop calling type tuples
>>>> type tuples.
>>>> They are not tuples, and do not contain (only) types.
>>>
>>> I agree, but that's what they're called in the compiler
>>> source code, so
>>> it's kinda hard to call them something else.
>>>
>>
>> http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/298vtt/dconf_2014_panel_with_walter_bright_and_andrei/ciiw5zb
>>
>>
>> :(
>
> Well, there are many things that could be considered tuples:
>
> void foo(int x, int y){
> // ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> }
>
> void main(){
> foo(1,2);
> // ^~~~~
> }
>
> :o)
That is certainly a useful language construct (what Dicebot call
TemplateArgumentList, but as we see, there s no template in this
sample code), but certainly not what is commonly called a tuple.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list