Cryptography and D

[Etienne via Digitalmars-d]

On 2014-06-29 3:19 AM, Adam Wilson wrote:
> Botan isn't as battle-tested as OpenSSL or Crypto++ but it was designed
> from the ground up to mitigate or prevent the kind of problems that
> OpenSSL is currently experiencing, and was implemented by someone who
> has done multiple Cryptographic Module Verifications for NIST. I
> personally went with Botan because it's relatively easy to create
> bindings for the languages I use and API is relatively sane for a crypto
> library (I'm looking at you OpenSSL).
>

It also seems to link statically with D projects, although it requires 
MSVC. I'd certainly build a dub package for it, but I'm too busy paving 
the way towards a native TLS library although I intend on using your 
crypto interface with it. ;)