Remember that Go vs D MQTT thing and how we wondered about dmd vs gdc?

Rikki Cattermole alphaglosined at gmail.com
Thu Mar 6 21:44:15 PST 2014


On Thursday, 6 March 2014 at 17:17:12 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
> Well, I found out the other day that vibe.d compiles with gdc 
> now so I went back to see if it made any difference to the 
> benchmarks I had.
>
> In throughput it made none.
>
> In the latency one it was about 5-10% faster with gdc compared 
> to dmd, which is good, but it still didn't change the relative 
> positions of the languages.
>
> So that was anti-climatic. :P
>
> Atila

I'm suspecting that Vibe's performance is heavily based upon the 
systems state i.e. hdd. Not so much on the code generation.
I don't know where we can get more performance out of it. But 
something doesn't quite feel right.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list