Philosophy of how OS API imports are laid out in druntime

[Iain Buclaw]

On 7 March 2014 01:24, Walter Bright <newshound2 at digitalmars.com> wrote:
> On 3/6/2014 5:10 PM, Sean Kelly wrote:
>>
>> However, as much as I like that having the Posix headers strongly
>> encourages the user to write portable code, I can see the idea
>> doesn't have a lot of traction around here.  I beleive Iain's
>> proposal is to phase them out and do exactly what you suggest,
>
>
> Thanks, Sean, I appreciate the graciousness of your reply.
>
>
>
>> only to make "whatever" "core.foo" rather than simply "core".
>> Which works for me as well.
>
> I don't have any axe to grind about what the "whatever" expands to, I'm cool
> with either.


I assume the C headers will remain strictly under core.stdc?  So it
might make sense to transition core.sys -> core.stdc.sys?