Remember that Go vs D MQTT thing and how we wondered about dmd vs gdc?

Atila Neves atila.neves at gmail.com
Fri Mar 7 00:23:08 PST 2014


It was already far above the competition in the throughput 
benchmark anyway. What exactly doesn't feel right to you?

On Friday, 7 March 2014 at 05:44:16 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
> On Thursday, 6 March 2014 at 17:17:12 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
>> Well, I found out the other day that vibe.d compiles with gdc 
>> now so I went back to see if it made any difference to the 
>> benchmarks I had.
>>
>> In throughput it made none.
>>
>> In the latency one it was about 5-10% faster with gdc compared 
>> to dmd, which is good, but it still didn't change the relative 
>> positions of the languages.
>>
>> So that was anti-climatic. :P
>>
>> Atila
>
> I'm suspecting that Vibe's performance is heavily based upon 
> the systems state i.e. hdd. Not so much on the code generation.
> I don't know where we can get more performance out of it. But 
> something doesn't quite feel right.



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list