Philosophy of how OS API imports are laid out in druntime

Walter Bright newshound2 at digitalmars.com
Fri Mar 7 01:34:33 PST 2014


On 3/7/2014 1:03 AM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> On 7 March 2014 08:34, Walter Bright <newshound2 at digitalmars.com> wrote:
>> On 3/7/2014 12:00 AM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>>>
>>> I assume the C headers will remain strictly under core.stdc?  So it
>>> might make sense to transition core.sys -> core.stdc.sys?
>>
>>
>> I think core.stdc for the Standard C headers can remain the same.
>>
>
> OK - now that has been sorted.  What's your opinion on where ports of
> standard C and system C headers should go?
>

Standard C => core.stdc

Operating system API = > core? core.sys? core.os? I don't have strong feelings 
about that.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list