Remember that Go vs D MQTT thing and how we wondered about dmd vs gdc?

Russel Winder russel at winder.org.uk
Fri Mar 7 10:01:35 PST 2014


On Fri, 2014-03-07 at 12:23 +0000, Atila Neves wrote:
[…]
> I suspect you might have missed the point of my original blog 
> post. Yes, it shows D beating Erlang and Go, and that's something 
> I obviously like. But that wasn't the point I was trying to make. 
> My point was that just by writing it in Go doesn't mean magical 
> performance benefits because of its CSP, and that vibe.d's fibers 
> would do just fine in a direct competition. The data seem to 
> support that.

That doesn't mean a CSP and dataflow implementations for D (à la
DataRush, GPars, Go, PythonCSP, PyCSP) shouldn't attempted.  Sadly I
think I do not have the time to drive such an endeavour, but I wish I
could contribute to it if someone else could drive.

-- 
Russel.
=============================================================================
Dr Russel Winder      t: +44 20 7585 2200   voip: sip:russel.winder at ekiga.net
41 Buckmaster Road    m: +44 7770 465 077   xmpp: russel at winder.org.uk
London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk  skype: russel_winder
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20140307/baa79ea1/attachment.sig>


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list