Formal review of std.lexer

[Dicebot]

On Wednesday, 26 February 2014 at 18:07:37 UTC, Jacob Carlborg 
wrote:
> On 2014-02-26 00:25, Dicebot wrote:
>
>> Don't know if it makes sense to introduce random package 
>> categorizatin.
>> I'd love to see more hierarchy in Phobos too but we'd first 
>> need to
>> agree to package separation principles then.
>
> Then that's what we need to do. I don't want any more top level 
> modules. There are already too many.

As much as I hate to say it, but such hierarchy is worth a DIP. 
Once it is formalized, I can proceed with it in review queue as 
if it was a new module proposal.