Proposal for fixing dchar ranges

[Walter Bright]

On 3/10/2014 2:09 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> What in my proposal makes you think you don't have unfettered access? The
> underlying immutable(char)[] representation is accessible. In fact, you would
> have more access, since phobos functions would then work with a char[] like it's
> a proper array.

You divide the D world into two camps - those that use 'struct string', and 
those that use immutable(char)[] strings.

 > I imagine only code that is currently UTF ignorant will break,

This also makes it a non-starter.