Broken?

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

On 3/11/14, 2:28 PM, Michel Fortin wrote:
> On 2014-03-11 21:16:28 +0000, Andrei Alexandrescu
> <SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.org> said:
>
>> On 3/11/14, 1:45 PM, John Colvin wrote:
>>> You do support the introduction of the virtual keyword though, yes?
>>
>> If explained a good use case, I would.
>
> class Foo
> {
> final:
>      void bar();
>      void baz();
>
> virtual:
>      void crack();
>      void crunch();
>
> final:
>      void dodge();
>      void damp();
>      virtual void divert();
>      void doh();
> }

Got it, thanks. If we don't move forward with final by default, this is 
too little utility to justify adding a keyword. (We could look into 
making it a contextual keyword.)

Andrei