Final by default?
Andrea Fontana
nospam at example.com
Thu Mar 13 03:35:33 PDT 2014
+1
On Thursday, 13 March 2014 at 10:24:10 UTC, Martin Krejcirik
wrote:
> To me it seems this whole debate highlights the problem in the
> release
> cycle, not in the development of the language. DMD needs a
> long-term
> stable point release, supported for at least a year. Everybody
> should
> expect possible breakage in the latest development release,
> even if
> unintended. The latest version should also be marked as
> development/experimental on the download page.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list