Possible change to array runtime?

[monarch_dodra]

On Thursday, 13 March 2014 at 18:09:55 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer 
wrote:
>> I had opened a pull to fix this, but it was never merged, due 
>> to the back and forth "fiasco" of tagging said reserve. Since 
>> I'm not fluent in D-runtime, I just let the issue drop.
>
> Which PR?
>
> -Steve

This first one was:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/pull/553
It "simply" marked it as nothrow, pure, but was turned down, as 
it called "throwing" code.

The second on is:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/pull/632
It shuffles code around to "prove" the call is actually nothrow, 
but IMO, is not worth it.

I believe in the first pull more than the second, which I believe 
is more "proof". If you are willing to review, I can re-open the 
first.