Final by default?

[monarch_dodra]

On Thursday, 13 March 2014 at 19:38:20 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky 
wrote:
> 13-Mar-2014 21:52, monarch_dodra пишет:
>> So maybe the issue could be solved by educating to always type 
>> (by
>> default):
>>
>> final class A
>> {...}
>
> Not the same as `final:` inside - the above just means you 
> can't inherit from A. Funnily enough any new methods in A would 
> still be virtual even if nothing can inherit from it!

What!? That's... horrible! What's the point of that? Is there 
*any* situation where that makes sense?