Final by default?

Walter Bright newshound2 at digitalmars.com
Thu Mar 13 16:43:28 PDT 2014


On 3/13/2014 4:10 PM, Sean Kelly wrote:
> To be pedantic, there was a TC released in 2003.  And many of the
> C++11 features were available years ahead of time from all the
> usual library sources.  But I agree that the ISO process isn't
> fast.  In fact, I think that's an actual goal, as the industries
> that depend on these standards are slow-moving as well.

Of course. Slow is not always a bad thing.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list