double.init is nan ..?

[Adam D. Ruppe]

On Friday, 14 March 2014 at 16:50:11 UTC, bearophile wrote:
> Keep in mind that there are many NaNs, and double.nan is not 
> the same as dounle init.

Oh yeah, I forgot about that! (double.init is a signaling nan 
while double.nan is not. There's a whole bunch of other nans 
possible in floating point too btw)

You're right. Looks like "is" always just compares the raw bits, 
which is good stuff when comparing with init.

> So this passes:
>
> assert(test is double.init);