UFCS and delegates

[Steve Teale]

On Saturday, 15 March 2014 at 09:09:23 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
> "Steve Teale"  wrote in message 
> news:dtevbsedsbbvqhaiefvi at forum.dlang.org...
>
>> Doesn't the logic of UFCS rather suggest that this should 
>> compile?
>
> Nope, UFCS is a rewrite rule, it doesn't change function 
> signatures.

I was asking about the logic - as expounded in the discussions 
before its introduction, as opposed to the implementation rules 
adopted.

Steve