Final by default?

[Araq]

On Saturday, 15 March 2014 at 22:50:27 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
> On Saturday, 15 March 2014 at 20:15:16 UTC, Araq wrote:
>>> However, this is clear that it come at a cost. I don't doubt 
>>> an OO language pushing this to the extreme would see concept 
>>> that confuse everybody emerging, pretty much like monads 
>>> confuse the hell out of everybody in functional languages.
>>
>> Looks like explicit continuation passing style to me. So "OO 
>> done right" means "Human compiler at work"...
>
> Sound like you are enjoying criticize OOP, but so far, you 
> didn't come up with anything interesting. Please bring 
> something to the table or cut the noise.

I note that you are not able to counter my argument and so you 
escape to the meta level. But don't worry, I won't reply anymore.