Assault & battery on pull requests

Jakob Ovrum jakobovrum at gmail.com
Sun Mar 16 15:32:12 PDT 2014


On Sunday, 16 March 2014 at 21:46:09 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu 
wrote:
> I have accumulated a bunch of insight in short term memory, 
> among which (1) people are happy to work on a variety of things 
> if given just a little vision and guidance; (2) it is more 
> difficult yet more productive in the long run to shepherd a 
> weak submission with good parts to completion, than to dismiss 
> it for its defects; (3) being able to drain the request 
> pipeline effectively is key to D's success.

I've always thought #2 is especially important when the submitter 
is a beginner to either D, dmd/druntime/Phobos or the review 
process; we should aim to foster a culture where the barrier to 
entry is as low as possible. It's always nice to see more 
returning submitters.

> After my review binge, Phobos open pull requests are 44, a 
> historical low. Please hop on and let's drain that pipe 
> entirely!

Thanks for the reviews. It would be really awesome if we could 
get the queue under control. I feel we are heading there.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list