Final by default?

Walter Bright newshound2 at digitalmars.com
Sun Mar 16 17:02:30 PDT 2014


On 3/16/2014 1:04 AM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> Indeed other stuff needs to be done, it just so happens that thanks to
> sys.posix's bad design splitting out other modules into ports will be more a
> pain.  But it shows how *no one* in that thread who responded either against the
> first pull, or went off and hijacked the second had a Scooby about the issue
> being addressed.  Didn't even have the curiosity to give alternate suggestions.

The 731 pull added more files under the old package layout.

The 732 added more files to the config system, which I objected to.

I believe my comments were apropos and suggested a better package structure than 
the one in the PR's.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list