Final by default?

[Sean Kelly]

On Sunday, 16 March 2014 at 08:04:24 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>
> Indeed other stuff needs to be done, it just so happens that  
> thanks to
> sys.posix's bad design splitting out other modules into ports  
> will be more
> a pain.  But it shows how *no one* in that thread who responded
>  either
> against the first pull, or went off and hijacked the second had
>  a Scooby
> about the issue being addressed.  Didn't even have the 
> curiosity to give
> alternate suggestions.

Pretty sure I agreed with your motivation here, though I figured
I'd defer the design to someone who has experience actually
dealing with this many ports.